The glossary lists terms used in CSSP Rules and the UCCMS.
Click here for the CSSP Rules definitions
Prohibited Behaviours
Maltreatment is doing something, or neglecting to do something, that results in harm or has the potential to do harm. The different forms of maltreatment are referred to as “prohibited behaviours.” The following list provides plain language brief explanations of the prohibited behaviours that are defined in the UCCMS. For the original detailed definitions, click here.
Aiding and Abetting: “Aiding” or “abetting” is doing anything to help maltreatment take place. This includes directly assisting, furthering, facilitating, promoting, or encouraging it. It can also include allowing someone who is suspended to participate in the adopting organization’s activities.
Boundary Transgression: Boundary transgressions are interactions or communications that go beyond what is expected or appropriate. A boundary transgression can be difficult to identify. It depends on context, including the age of the people involved and whether there is a power imbalance. It may not be maltreatment but is still inappropriate under the circumstances.
Discrimination: Discrimination can be obvious or subtle. It refers to treating people differently on a range of prohibited grounds. Discrimination can include, but isn’t limited to, denying someone access to services, benefits, or opportunities. It could also look like treating a person unfairly, communicating hate messages or unwelcome remarks or jokes, or the perpetuation of harmful attitudes and stereotypes.
Failure to Report: Early intervention is required to prevent the escalation of prohibited behaviours. That’s why adult participants must make a report when they know about another person’s prohibited behaviour. If they fail to do so, they are committing a violation. It could also be a violation if they ought to have known about the behaviour. The person making the report doesn’t need to determine whether a violation took place. Their responsibility is simply to report the behaviour. A person who is subject to maltreatment is not obligated to report it, nor are minors.
Grooming: Grooming involves conduct that makes someone more vulnerable to sexual maltreatment. The grooming process is often gradual and involves building trust and comfort with a person, and sometimes also with the trusted adults and peers around the person. It may begin with subtle behaviours that may not appear to be inappropriate but that can serve to sexualize a relationship, reduce sexual inhibitions, or normalize inappropriate behaviour. It may include the testing of boundaries (like seemingly accidental touching) that gradually escalates to sexual maltreatment (for example, sexualized touching). Repeated boundary transgressions might be grooming.
Intentionally Reporting a False Allegation: An allegation is false if the person making a report knows that the events they’re reporting didn’t happen. This is different from an unsubstantiated allegation, where there isn’t enough evidence to determine whether it’s true or not. Reporting an unsubstantiated allegation is not necessarily a violation, unless it’s made in bad faith.
Interference with or Manipulation of Process: Interfering with investigations or disciplinary processes is a violation. That could include interfering with evidence, harassing or intimidating anyone involved, failing to comply with sanctions, or publicizing information that should be confidential. However, it is not a violation if a survivor of abuse hides information, whether out of embarrassment or shame, or to protect the perpetrator.
Neglect: Neglect involves failing to care for someone properly and is evaluated with consideration given to the participant’s needs and requirements. This could include not allowing an athlete adequate recovery time or treatment for an injury, disregarding or not considering a person’s physical or intellectual disability, not ensuring appropriate supervision of an athlete during travel, training or competition, not considering the welfare of the athlete when prescribing a diet or other weight control methods, failure to ensure a safe environment and equipment.
Physical Maltreatment: Physical maltreatment involves any pattern or a single serious incident of deliberate conduct, including contact behaviours and non-contact behaviours, that has the potential to be harmful to a person’s physical or psychological well-being.
Psychological Maltreatment: Psychological maltreatment can be verbal or physical. It can also take the form of denying someone appropriate attention or support; or it can be a harmful pattern of behaviour from someone in a position of trust or authority. Psychological maltreatment doesn’t require intent to cause harm. Whether or not it happened is based on an objective view of the behaviour.
Retaliation: People need to feel safe coming forward to report maltreatment. It’s prohibited to retaliate if they report possible prohibited behaviour. Retaliation includes threatening, intimidating, harassing, or coercing anyone who is participating in the process. Discouraging someone from reporting, or from participating in the process, is also a violation. If retaliation occurs, it can and should be reported.
Sexual Maltreatment: Sexual maltreatment involves any pattern or a single incident, whether physical or psychological in nature, that is committed, threatened, or attempted, and that has the potential to be harmful to a person’s sexual integrity. It can occur in person or online, and includes contact and non-contact behaviours, as well as sexual harassment.
Subjecting a Participant to the Risk of Maltreatment: People in positions of authority can’t put others into situations that they know (or ought to have known) would put someone at risk of maltreatment. This can include things like:
- asking an athlete and trainer to share a hotel room when travelling,
- hiring someone with a history of prohibited behaviour who is serving a sanction,
- forcing athletes to train in unsafe conditions, like in terrible weather, or using unsafe equipment,
- assigning a guide or support staff to a para athlete who has a history of prohibited behaviour, or
- assigning a guide or support staff to a para athlete without consulting with the athlete.
Power Imbalance: Power imbalances can lead to abuse and maltreatment. A power imbalance exists when someone has authority or control over someone else, in a position to grant or deny benefits or advancement to the person, or is responsible for the physical or psychological well-being of the person. Whether there is a power imbalance depends on the situation, including the perspective of the person with less power. For examples, click here.
CSSP Rules Definitions
The following terms are from the DEFINITIONS section of the CSSP Rules.
Canadian Sport Dispute Resolution Code: The procedural code of the SDRCC.
Impacted Person: A person who has directly experienced alleged prohibited behaviour and has been identified as an impacted person by the CCES in the CSSP Process. An impacted person may or may not be the reporting person in a report.
Minor: A person under the age of 19.
Reporting Person: The individual who has made a report to the CCES alleging that a participant has engaged in prohibited behaviour. The reporting person may or may not be the person directly impacted by the prohibited behaviour (the impacted person).
Respondent: A participant alleged in a report to have engaged in one or more prohibited behaviours.
Defined terms shall include their plural and possessive forms, as well as those terms used as other parts of speech.